Various efforts to measure power and power relationships quantitatively undertaken by political scientists, including such distinguished scholars as Robert North, Richard Rosecrance, A. Szabo, “Prince Kaunitz and the Balance of Power,” International History Review, 1 (1979), 399–408. Schroeder, “The Nineteenth Century System: Balance of Power or Political Equilibrium?” Review of International Studies, 15 (1989), 136–37.įrank A. Haas, “The Balance of Power: Prescription, Concept, or Propaganda,” World Politics, 5 (1953), 442–77 Richard Little, “Deconstructing the Balance of Power: Two Traditions of Thought,” Review of Lnternational Studies, 15 (1989), 87–100Į. Hinsley, Power and the Pursuit of Peace (Cambridge, 1963) and Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society (New York, 1977). Both Gulick’s and Kissinger’s works employ it, as does F. What else were the statesmen at Vienna doing if not restoring a balance of power in Europe by redistributing territories and peoples? What can account for international peace and stability after 1815 if not that the European balance of power was restored after a generation of French revolutionary expansion and Napoleonic imperialism, this time supported and strengthened through a system of alliances, treaty guarantees, and Concert diplomacy? 2 Not only did their language seem to make the balance of power a vital goal and working principle of the settlement but so did their conduct and the outcome of their efforts. 1 Irrefutable evidence seems to come directly from the peacemakers at Vienna themselves in everything from official treaties to private letters and diaries, they spoke of peace and stability in terms of a proper balance (“juste équilibre”) achieved by a redistribution of forces (“répartition des forces”), or in similar balance of power phrases. However much historians have differed in interpreting various aspects of the Vienna settlement and the nineteenth century international system founded upon it, they have never doubted that these included a balance of power as an essential ingredient. But do not step on the toes of activists and victims of brutality in the process.The question posed by the title of this essay must appear a bit unreal. Essentially, you had to have done some significant work to contribute to the betterment of those who currently suffer oppression.īy all means, mourn your childhood and media heroes when they pass. Again, it's based upon the above criteria. Merely being Black, Indigenous, or LGBT and passing away doesn't necessarily mean use of "rest in power" is appropriate upon a person's passing. It's usually used for folks who fit one of three categories:ġ.) An activist who has contributed greatly to Black, Indigenous, and LGBT civil rights causes.Ģ.) A person who died as a result of police or state brutality.ģ.) A person whose work has otherwise contributed positively and notably to the cultural milieu and pride of Black, Indigenous, and LGBT people. However, you may have seen people use "rest in power" and may have wondered what the difference is. In a more agnostic sense, it's also just politeness and good form. When people pass away, it is common to say "rest in peace" as a platitude to wish their soul a good eternal rest.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |